这个空中豪华寓所是: 复式~八房三廳N厕~一个15 M 之室內恆温泳池!还有, 一个水力按摩浴池在露台 + 180 度广角 BREATHE-TAKING 海景 !! = KILLS ME.....!!! WAKE UP !!!
 

Roy 發表在 痞客邦 留言(4) 人氣()

我反对在公开场合粗口爛舌﹔但有时过度气憤,人就容易按捺不住"爆粗", 什至"动粗".....
马场里,经常见马迷"妈妈声",臭骂骑师拉马: 明明跑外边可望空沖刺,却走进內欄马叢里,不败才怪.....
同样地,用半生几百万积蓄买的债券、股票一夜泡汤,不骂娘才怪!!
药物有菌、过期、沒注册等等问題,你是病人吃了=====能不气憤吗??
还有,更离谱的,报案求助的女生竟在旺角警局內被警察強暴了!!
一大堆令人气结气憤的管冶问題都出現在这政府,但竟没有官员被贬或下台......
这政府,真迫人要讲粗口!!

Roy 發表在 痞客邦 留言(1) 人氣()

爱上了上海这新天地===田子坊,在上海鬧市小巷里的一个芸术创意天地....
小弄里有好多特色得意小店和OPEN CAFE,非常歐洲 FEEL....
活生生活的芸朮,一点不造作......
就是喜欢那亮衣架耸里的小招牌.....
和那牆上一角的色彩,还有那一点悠闲宁静的气氛....
 

Roy 發表在 痞客邦 留言(2) 人氣()

The gold price keeps rising.....but I rather go for those under-priced stocks !!

Roy 發表在 痞客邦 留言(1) 人氣()

  • Mar 27 Fri 2009 02:04
  • 加油

油车为油站加油?或是油站为油车加油??

Roy 發表在 痞客邦 留言(1) 人氣()

美国金融机構相繼破产倒闭,大量资金流失>>>去了那里呢?我一直在懷疑?
钱肯定从企业帳上流进个人口袋了!但这么庞大资金,存在银行户口收息?不会,因为他们能搞夸这些金融企业,他们一定不信銀行!但总不会放在家里床底吧!究竟资金去了那呢???
这天早上开车路上,财经报导一言惊醒梦中人!所有什么指数、价位天天在跌,唯独金价却仍坚挺上扬!!我记得我去年头脱手最后一两黃金是七千四,那时恆生指数贴近二万五﹔今天恆生指数快跌至万二点,但金价却反升至八千五!!!
大噩们一直已偷偷炒起黃金了.....
 

Roy 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

The aquarium with a big fish is the toilet of a 7-Star hotel !! Eye opening !!
 
七星级酒店內之男衛生间,绝对有海洋公园 feel....

Roy 發表在 痞客邦 留言(1) 人氣()

我不得不把这个人"坚尼斯" 纪錄写下......
昨天我命中了超级大冷马,W122倍 !!! P21倍!!!!是这季最高派彩的一匹!!真是个大惊喜!!我確实猶豫了良久在最后一刻才下注...
这匹马名叫 GOOD LUCK WIN --- 宝成智星!
这一陣的松林之星、足球大师、马来之宝、真奇宝、紫荊、太阳勁力、京城孖宝、火鳳凰、大喜讯、活源海等等,令我回味无窮,亦为大伙增添不少零用钱和欢乐!

Roy 發表在 痞客邦 留言(2) 人氣()

女友人結婚多載,与一个我认为不同类之人同居一籠,终于出事了!老公最近坦然相告外面已有新欢,令她苦恼非常。。。
女友人面对这困局,伤心痛心之余却还心有不甘,企图极力挽回老公!!大家苦勸她長痛不如短痛,但她还是一意孤行!不知是固執或逞強,她坚信老公仍爱她,所以才向她"坦白"这婚外情!!
唉,我只叹她太不懂男人了!男人心已不在,不在乎你感受,才会将事实直讲!到这階段,等同 CANCER 末期,无得救也!!男人若对妳耍谎、哄妳,那说明 HE STILL CARES...多年前,快到圣旦时,一个做 MODEL的女友走来问我何解---她新相识之外籍男友告诉她﹕"I WANT TO SPEND THE CHRISTMAS ALONE, 要去避靜!所以不能陪她!"我听了,內里心肺笑到反转调了位!但我安慰她, 这男人是喜欢你的!
大抵人好物好,相处久了,就有感情,要剎时拉倒,谈何容易!
今天街头巷尾,困惑着那些 HSBC FANS的,不也就是这种"情意結"吗??

Roy 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

Life simply is so unpredictable....even I cannot believe this is happening with HSBC's stock !!
But at least Shirley Yam of SCMP shares my same feeling towards HSBC -- "It is time to end the unrequited love. Like parting from a long-time boyfriend, it isn't easy. But to save you from regret, it has to be done."   She explained: "First, he doesn't love you. HSBC management has shown little care for the interests of its faithful retail investors. Despite its image as a banner-holder of good corporate governance, the bank issued no profit warning and stonewalled any press questions about the rights issue rumour in the past three months as its share price dived on the uncertainty. Instead, we were reading about the issue in various British publications.

HSBC's explanation, bluntly put by chief executive Michael Geoghegan: "There was no need to have a profit warning. The assessment of the financials was clear in the marketplace. All in, the analysts were pretty close to what the results were."

Since when did HSBC make analysts its official spokespeople? Since when did the bank find it okay to leave its shareholders to feed on leftovers from institutional investors that are privileged with hourly updates by analysts? Since when did the bank decide to leave us to the mercy of insiders?

Second, the guy is not as good as you think. While the management may still pride itself on the fact that it has smaller problems than its rivals, its judgment is now in doubt.

Back in early 2007, HSBC was among the first to be aware of the subprime mortgage crisis when a sharp rise in defaults at its US consumer finance unit raised the red flag. It did scale back the riskier lending, but it was too little and too late.

In November last year, Standard Chartered and many others went for rights issues and share placements to recapitalise themselves to survive the long winter and to remain competitive against a growing number of "nationalised" rivals. HSBC chose not to.

Back then, one of its senior executives, Vincent Cheng Hoi-chuen, said that the bank was comfortable with its 8.9 per cent tier 1 capital adequacy ratio, and a rights issue would dampen its return on equity and the share price.

Are these facts and concerns so different now as to justify a rights issue when the share price has dropped below HK$50 instead of HK$80 two months ago? Better judgment by the management would have saved shareholders from significant and painful dilution.

Third, the guy may get even worse. Even after its latest massive write-down, the bank retains assets valued at US$100 billion in its North American "run-off portfolio". As the housing market and unemployment get worse, the provision can only grow.

And we haven't mentioned Europe and Asia yet. Bankers worldwide are praying every day that the over-leveraged "eastern European bloc" can hold on. If they fail, how well can Asia survive, despite China's determination to spend its way out?

Don't underestimate the chance of another rights issue unless you believe Beijing will bail the bank out at above market price for political reasons.

Fourth, he is no longer the man you fell in love with. HSBC has changed, and so has the world. The bank has been dragged down by bad assets and is without government money. Meanwhile, the world has leapt from 20 years of non-stop growth into recession, and from a free market into state interventionism.

HSBC won't continue being the unsexy but stable stock. The rights issue will increase the number of its shares by 40 per cent, making it much easier for hedge funds to borrow and play with its shares. Volatility will be its new character in the short and medium term.

Having read this far, many of you will say: "I know, I know. But I got it at HK$90. Should I throw in the towel now, I will lose half of my money. If I join the rights issue and bring down the average cost, I may still be able to recoup it in a few years' time. After all, it's HSBC and it has fallen a lot."

Well, I have heard this line before.

It's 2000. Richard Li Tzar-kai was proposing a merger with Hong Kong Telecommunications. The share price of Mr Li's empire was going south. The press wrote about a formidably high gearing for the post-merger HKT. But more than 70 per cent of HKT's shareholders chose to receive shares instead of cash. The rest is history.

I am not saying HSBC will spiral downwards like HKT. The moral of the story is never look at what happened but consider carefully what will happen. It is about not letting wishful thinking and emotion rule but facts and realism.

After all, HSBC is not the only stock in town. Should you believe in an economic rebound, there are stocks better positioned and with less baggage.

Sell the shares, or at least sell the rights, and put the money into the better alternatives to recoup your loss. Waiting for the sick elephant to fly is not the way to go. "

I cannot agree with her more on this.....a real sad surprise to many HK HSBC fans !! You may think I hold big stake of HSBC stock...luckily, I do not !

Roy 發表在 痞客邦 留言(3) 人氣()